Singapore Court confirms validity of asymmetric arbitration agreements

Jurisprudencia2016 | Noviembre 30
The Singapore High Court in Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 238 recently confirmed that a dispute-resolution agreement constituted a valid arbitration agreement, even if it only granted one party the right to elect to arbitrate a dispute.

The decision in Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 238 brings welcome clarity on what constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, while shedding further light on the different instances in which an arbitration agreement might be found to be null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.

Origen:
Singapore Court confirms validity of asymmetric arbitration agreements | Insight | Nabarro

Anuncios

Adelante! Comparte tu conocimiento y experiencia