El asegurado no puede imponer un arbitraje en las pólizas de defensa jurídica

Tribunal Constitucional España2018 | Abril 20
El Tribunal Constitucional (TC) ha anulado un precepto de la ley de contrato de seguro que facultaba al asegurado a someter a arbitraje cualquier diferencia sobre el contrato que pueda surgir entre él y la compañía en el ámbito del seguro de defensa jurídica. El artículo anulado disponía: “el asegurado tendrá derecho a someter a arbitraje cualquier diferencia que pueda surgir entre él y el asegurador sobre el contrato de seguro”.
Sigue leyendo


US Supreme Court Invalidates State Rule That Disfavored Arbitration

Tribunal Supremo EEUU2017 | Agosto 21
The US Supreme Court invalidated a state court rule that had held unenforceable arbitration agreements entered into under broad powers of attorney whenever the powers of attorney did not expressly entitle the representative to enter into an arbitration agreement.
Sigue leyendo

España: El juez tiene competencia para enjuiciar un convenio de arbitraje

Jurisprudencia2017 | Julio 7
Según sentencia de la Sala de lo Civil del Tribunal Supremo sobre la competencia para enjuiciar un convenio de arbitraje ante la alegación de falta de jurisdicción, corresponde al órgano judicial realizar, sin restricciones, un enjuiciamiento completo sobre la validez, eficacia y aplicabilidad del convenio arbitral. Sigue leyendo

U.S. Supreme Court questions validity of arbitration agreements for nursing homes

Tribunal Supremo EEUU2017 | Febrero 23
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the validity of arbitration agreements used by nursing homes in a case involving Kindred Healthcare.

The justices recently ruled in favor of arbitration agreements in two separate cases but they appeared to take a more critical approach to the practice when questioning Andrew Pincus, a lawyer representing Kindred Healthcare.
Sigue leyendo

Austrian Supreme Court Establishes New Standards as Regards the Decisive Underlying Reasoning of Arbitral Awards

Jurisprudencia2017 | Enero 2
The decisive underlying reasoning (motifs, Begründung) is, without doubt, an essential part of any arbitral award and as such bears the potential of frustrating parties and arbitrators alike. On the one hand, elaborate reasoning in arbitral awards more often than not comes at the price of long waiting periods for the issuance of the awards, and periods of meticulous drafting on the part of the arbitrator(s). On the other hand, a lack of elaborate reasoning may likewise be a headache, since it exposes the arbitral award to setting aside.
Sigue leyendo

Enforcement of arbitration rulings faces challenge in Asia

Jurisprudencia2016 | Diciembre 28
A dispute between a European group and its partner in Thailand about arbitration rulings is raising doubts about investor safeguards in Asian countries where such awards are being challenged.
Sigue leyendo

Annulment of international arbitral award: the French Conseil d’Etat makes first foray into the fiefdom of the civil Cassation Court

Consejo de Estado, Francia2016 | Diciembre 23
On 9 November 2016 and for the first time, the French State Council (Conseil d’Etat) set aside an international arbitral award. The award related to a public contract performed in France. The award was partially set aside on the ground that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply a mandatory rule of domestic French public law.
Sigue leyendo

Two Tier Arbitration Procedure Permissible Under The Laws Of India: SC

Jurisprudencia India2016 | Diciembre 16
In a landmark judgment accepting the concept of ‘two tier arbitration’ or ‘second instance arbitration’, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justices Madan B. Lokur, R.K Agrawal and D.Y Chandrachud answering a reference made in 2006 due to divergence of opinions between Justice S.B.Sinha and Tarun Chatterjee, held that arbitration clauses which provide for a two- step arbitration process are valid under Indian arbitral jurisprudence.
Sigue leyendo

Singapore Court confirms validity of asymmetric arbitration agreements

Jurisprudencia2016 | Noviembre 30
The Singapore High Court in Dyna-Jet Pte Ltd v Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2016] SGHC 238 recently confirmed that a dispute-resolution agreement constituted a valid arbitration agreement, even if it only granted one party the right to elect to arbitrate a dispute.
Sigue leyendo

U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear tobacco arbitration dispute

Tabaco2016 | Octubre 11
An arbitration panel found that six states, including Pennsylvania and Maryland, had not met their side of the bargain to ensure, as required, that companies that were part of the settlement did not disproportionately lose market share as a result of the terms of the deal to competitors that shunned it.
Sigue leyendo

German Supreme Court upholds CAS arbitration agreement and award

Resultado de imagen de sports2016 | Septiembre 15
In a landmark decision dated 7 June 2016 (file no. KZR 6/15) the German Supreme Court has confirmed that the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne (CAS) is a properly constituted arbitral tribunal and that an arbitration clause included in agreements between an athlete and a monopolistic international sports association referring all disputes to the CAS was generally valid.
Sigue leyendo

EEUU | Federal | Tribunal Supremo | 2011 | AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Et Ux.

Banderas > América > USA

Estados Unidos de América | United States of America
Sigue leyendo